Опыт фиксации квалифицирующих признаков состава преступления в странах СНГ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2025-1-1-130-137Keywords:
уголовное законодательство стран СНГ, Model Criminal Code for the CIS member states, criminal legislation of the CIS countries, entry into the courtyard of a residential building, unmanned aerial vehicle, dangerous and especially dangerous recidivism of crimes, types of intentAbstract
Purpose. Conducting a comparative analysis of the qualifying features of crimes in states with a common historical, cultural and civilizational path.Materials and methods. In the context of deglobalization and regionalization of international law, emphasis is placed on the Model Criminal Code for the CIS member states, as well as the Criminal Codes of such republics friendly to Russia as Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.Results. The structural and substantive features of recording the qualifying features of crimes in the above-mentioned legal acts are considered. Specific examples of description of these features are identified in comparison with the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The original structuring of the relevant legislative material is implemented in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus: qualifying features in a number of cases are listed in an alternative way (without highlighting points). In turn, in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, a "splitting" of a single feature into separate points is revealed. In terms of content, exclusive legislative decisions are the recognition of the increased public danger of theft with illegal entry into a vehicle, as well as violation of privacy using a remotely controlled unmanned aerial vehicle. The experience of differentiating criminal liability depending on the forms of complicity in a crime, type of recidivism and the type of intent deserves attention.Conclusions. Based on the "classic" set of qualifying elements of crimes in the Model Criminal Code for the CIS member states, legislators from different countries have independently optimized their description.The similarity of the general approaches of legislators to the establishment of qualifying signs has been revealed; the assessment of the degree of their public danger, as well as the list of crimes in individual components, vary.The differentiation of criminal liability at the level of qualifying elements of a crime in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation should be carried out taking into account not only positive foreign experience, but also the achievements of domestic criminal law doctrine.Downloads
References
Мотин А. В. О некоторых вопросах дифференциации уголовной ответственности за преступления против личности посредством квалифицирующих признаков // Вопросы российского и международного права. 2020. Т. 10. № 7-1. С. 127–141. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2020.57.97.017
Коняхин В.П., Полтавец В.В. Карательный арсенал современного международного уголовного права // Актуальные проблемы теории и практики уголовного права и процесса в современных условиях: Мат-лы III междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Донецк, 2023. С. 320–328.
Российское уголовное право. Общая часть: учебник для вузов / под ред. д-ра юрид. наук, проф., заслуженного юриста РФ В. П. Коняхина и д-ра юрид. наук, проф. М. Л. Прохоровой. М., 2014.
Дядюн К. В. Регламентация ответственности за неосторожное причинение смерти: сравнительно-правовой анализ законодательства стран СНГ // Международный журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук. 2023. № 11-1 (86). С. 83-88.
Шипунова М. Н. Обман как способ совершения преступления: проблемы теории и практики // Азиатско-тихоокеанский регион: экономика, политика, право. 2024. Т. 26. № 3. С. 169–181. https://doi.org/10.24866/1813-3274/2024-3/169-181
Кочои С. М. Уголовно-правовые риски использования беспилотных транспортных средств// Актуальные проблемы российского права. 2021. Т. 16. № 7 (128). С. 125–135. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.128.7.125-135
Камалова Г. Г. Некоторые вопросы уголовно-правовой ответственности в сфере применения систем искусственного интеллекта и робототехники // Вестник Удмуртского университета. 2020. Т. 30. Вып. 3. С. 382–388. https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9593-2020-30-3-382-388
Асланян Р. Г. Дифференцация ответственности и систематизация предписаний особенной части уголовного права // Юридический вестник Кубанского государственного университета. 2022. № 3. С. 87–94.https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-3-87-94
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bagaev V.V.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.